The Conqunt of Kheibar. 1st and 2nd Jumad, A.H. VII. August and September, A.D. 628.
Ętat 60.
On his return from Hodeibia, as I have before related, in the spring of the year 628, Mahomet had promised to those who accompanied him in that pilgrimage the early prospect of a rich and extensive plunder. The summer passed without any enterprise whatever; and his followers began to be impatient for the fulfilment of their expectations. But quiet and peace still prevailed around. Mahomet probably waited for some act of aggression on the part of the Jews of Kheibar (it was the fertile lands and villages of that tribe which he had destined for his followers), or on the part of their allies the Bani Ghatafan, to furnish the excuse for an attack. But no such opportunity offering, he resolved, in the autumn of this year, on a sudden and unprovoked invasion of their territory.1
1 Hishami places this expedition in Moharram (April), or the
second month after the pilgrimage to Hodeibia. In another place
he mentions Ramadhan, or December, 627, which is evidently
wrong. The date given by Wackidi and by his Secretary, which
I have followed is (apart from their strong authority) probable,-
The army marched from Medina, sixteen hundred strong; being about the same number as had followed the Prophet on his pilgrimage to Hodeibia. But the force was greatly more powerful in cavalry: -the number on the present occasion being variously estimated at from one hundred to two hundred.1 The Mussulman horse had never before exceeded thirty. Many of the other inhabitants of Medina, and the Bedouin tribes, who had neglected the Prophet's former summons, would gladly now have joined the tempting expedition; but they were not permitted, and their mortification was great at being left behind. Omm Salma, the same wife who accompanied the Prophet to Hodeibia, was again his companion on the present journey.2
The distance, perhaps one hundred miles, was accomplished in three forced rnarches.3 So quick
(1), because it gives sufficient time after the pilgrimage to
Hodeibia for the embassy to travel to Abyssinia and return, as
it did at the close of the Kheibar campaign; and (2), because
Wackidi distinctly says that Mahomet returned to Medina the
following month, namely, the second Jumad (Sep.), and adds that
in that month, he warred against Wadi al Cora, on his way back.
1 K. Wackidi, 121 and 122 ½.
2 K. Wackidi, 120 ½.
3 Kheibar is agreed by all the early historians to be eight
stages (berid) from Medina. Each stage is said to be twelve
Arabian miles (i.e. four parasangs, of each three miles); this
would make the whole distance ninety-six Arabian miles; but
the Arabian mile is a very uncertain quantity. Burckhardt, on
hearsay, makes the distance "four or five days (some say only
three) from Medina," p. 463. "Tayma is three days from
Kheibar,
was the movement, the surprise so complete, that the cultivators of Kheibar, issuing forth in the morning to their fields, suddenly found themselves confronted by a great army, aud rushed back to the city in dismay. This rapid approach cut off all hope to the Jews, of timely aid from the Bani Ghatafan.1
The rich vale of Kheibar was studded with villages and fortresses, strongly posted on rocks or fall before eminences, which here and there rose from amidst the date groves and fields corn. One by one, before any general opposition could be organized,
and as many from Hedjer, in an easterly direction." Kheibar is
six hours off the Hajj route. K..Wackidi, 120 ½ . - These points
may help to fix its position.
Burton (ii. 298,) thinks the distance between Kheibar and
Medina in Burckhardt's map is too great by two degrees of
latitude, and he would reduce it to eighty miles. But he perhaps unduly
underrates it, especially when he says that "camels go there easily in three days."
Hishami gives three intermediate stages: - Isn, Sabba, and
Raji.
1 The Secretary does not allude to the Bani Ghatafan, but
Hishami says that Mahomet took up a position so as to cut off
their assistance, p. 332. He adds that the Ghatafan did go forth
to aid their allies, but returned on a rumour that their own homes
were being attacked. But the fact is, that Mahomet's advent was
totally unexpected. So the Secretary: - "When the Moslem army
alighted before Kheibar, they did not stir that night, nor did a
fowl cackle at them, till the sun arose. Then the Kheibarites
opened their fortresses as usual, and went forth to their labours
with their cattle, their spades, hoes, and other instruments of
husbandry; suddenly they perceived the army in front of them,
and fled back into their forts, screaming out,- "It is Mahomet
and his hosts!" K. Wackidi, 120 ½.
these forts were attacked and carried.1 "Kheibar is undone,2" exclaimed Mahomet, as he passed from one stronghold triumphantly to another: "Great is the Lord! Truly when I light upon the coasts of any people, wretched for them is that day!3, From the villages in the valleys pf Natah and Shickk, which were gained with little loss, Mahomet proceeded to the region of Kuteiba. Here the Jews, who had now had time to rally round their chief Kinana (he had succeeded to the command, on the assassination
of his grandfather Abul Huckeick, and of Oseir, several months before 4), posted themselves in front of the citadel Camuss, and resolved on a desperate struggle. After some vain attempts to dislodge them, Mahomet planned a grand attack :- "I will
1 The Secretary mentions the following forts in Kheibar :- Al
Natah; the fort of Sabs of Naim; the castle of Al Zobeir; Al
Shickk; of Obey; and Al Nozar. Also the fortresses in the region of Al
Kateiba, Al Camuss, Al Watih, and Salalim; this latter belonged
to the family of Abul Huckeick, lately assassinated.
2 A play on the word Kheibar, by inversion
3 The following remarkable prayer, of the genuineness of which,
however, there is no sufficient evidence, is given by Hishami, as
recited by Mahomet on his advance to the attack :- "O God!
Lord of heavens, and of that which they overshadow; Lord of
all lands and of what they bear: Lord of the Devils and of those
they mislead: Lord of the winds and of that which they drive
before them! We beseech thee to grant us whatever good is in
this town, its inhabitants, and outskirts: and we implore protection from the evil thereof, from the evil of its inhabitants and of its outskirts. Forward! in the name of the Lord!". p.332.
4 See above, chapter xviii.
give the Eagle," he said, --- "the great black Flag,----- into the hands of one that loveth the Lord and his Apostle, even as he is beloved of them; he shall gain the victory."1 Next morning the flag was placed in Ali's hands, and the troops advanced. At this moment, a soldier stepped forth from the Jewish line, and challenged his adversaries to single combat:- "I am Marhab," he cried, "as all Kheibar knoweth, - a warrior bristling with arms, when the war fiercely burneth." The first Moslem who answered the challenge, aimed a blow at the Jewish champion with deadly force, but the sword recoiled upon himself, and he fell fatally wounded.2 Marhab repeated his vain-glorious challenge, and then Ali himself advanced saying, -"I am he whom my mother named the Lion,---- like a lion of the howling
1 There had been no great standard like this before. It is said
to have been made out of a black dress, or mantle, worn by
Ayesha,- a gallant device,- and was called ucab, the "Black
Eagle." There were two other smaller banners, held, one by
Hobab, the other by Sad ibn Obada, both Citizens. K. Wackidi,
120.
2 The people cried out "Aamir"(that was his name) "hath killed
himself: his works are vain" (i. e. because of his suicidal
death).
"Nay," said Mahomet, "he shall have a double reward!," On
the road to Kheibar, this man had recited some martial verses
before Mahomet, who thanked him, saying,- "The Lord have
mercy on thee!" It is pretended that this mode of blessing from
Mahomet, invariably portended an impending martyrdom. The
verses, by the way, are the same as those ascribed to Mahomet at
the battle of the Ditch. K.Wackidi 122.
wilderness, I weigh my foes in a gigantic balance."1 The combatants closed, and Ali cleft the head of Marhab in two. The brother of Marhab having The Jews rashly renewed the challenge, Zobeir went forth and beaten back slew him. 2
The Moslem line made now a general advance, and, after a sharp conflict, drove back the enemy. In this battle, Ali performed great feats of prowess. Having lost his shield, he seized the portion of a door, which he wielded effectually in its stead. Tradition, in its expansive process, has transformed this extempore shield into a gigantic beam, and magnified the hero into a second Samson.3 The victory was decisive, for the Jews lost ninety-three
1 That is, "I will make a fearful havoc." The two word.
used here for lion by Ali, are Haida and Laith.
2 As Zobeir walked forth to the combat, his mother Safia ran
up to Mahomet in alarm, crying out that her son would be
killed : - "Not so, my Aunt!" replied Mahomet, "he will slay
his fellow, if the Lord will!" Many women went from Medina
on this campaign to minister to the wounded. A story, very
illustrative or the combined simplicity and coarseness of Arab
manners, is given in the conversation of Mahomet with a young
woman of the Bani Ghifar, who rode on the same camel, and
confided to him certain of her ailments. Hishami, 340.
3 The story is in the ordinary cast of exaggerated tradition.
Abu Rafi, Mahomet's servant, went after the battle to see the beam,
in company with seven others, who together tried to turn it over,
and were unable! Hishami, 385. The Secretary does not give
this foolish story.
According to Hishimi, it was not Ali who killed Marhab, but
Mohammad ibn Maslama; the latter, he says, was resolved to
avenge the death of his brother Mahmood, who had been killed
by a millstone cast on him from the walls of the fortress first
attacked. Ibid.
men; while of the Moslems, only nineteen were killed throughout the whole campaign.1
After this defeat, the fortress of Camuss surrendered, on condition that the inhabitants were
free to leave the country, but that they should give
up all their property to the conqueror. With the
rest, came forth Kinana, chief of the Jews of Kheibar,
and his cousin. Mahomet accused them both of
keeping back, in contravention of the compact, a
portion of their riches, especially the treasures of
the Bani Nadhir, which Kinana had obtained as a
marriage portion with his wife, the daughter of the
chief of that tribe.2 "Where are the vessels of gold,"
he asked," which ye' used to lend to the people of
Mecca?" They protested that they no longer possessed them. "if ye conceal anything from me,"
continued Mahomet, "and I should gain knowledge
of it, then your lives and the lives of your families
shall be at my disposal." They answered that it
should be so. A traitorous Jew, having divulged
to Mahomet the place in which a part of their
wealth was deposited, he sent and fetched it. On
the discovery of this attempt at imposition, Kinana
1 The Secretary gives the number of killed at only fifteen; but
Hishami (who specifies the names), numbers twenty; and both
include Bishr, who was poisoned. Of the killed, four were
Refugees.
2 The father of his wife Safia, was Huwey, who it will be
remembered was sent into exile with the Bard Nadhir; but he
returned with the Coreish to the siege of Medina, and perished
in the massacre of the Bard Coreitza.
was subjected to cruel torture, -- "fire being placed
upon his breast till his breath had almost departed,"
-in the hope that he would confess where the rest
of his treasures were concealed. Mahomet then
gave command, and the heads of the two chiefs
were severed from their bodies.
The scene of torture and bloodshed was hardly
ended, when Mahomet sent Bilal to fetch the wife of
Kinana, whose beauty was probably well known at
Medina.1 Bilal speedily performed his errand. Finding with Safia another damsel, her cousin, he brought
them both straight ecross the battlefield strewed with
the dead, and close by the corpses of Kinana and
his cousin. At the ghastly sight of their headless
trunks, the companion of Safia screamed wildly,
beating her face, and casting dust upon her head.
"Take that she-devil hence;" said Mahomet angrily:
but aside he chided Bilal for his want of consideration in bringing the women so near the bodies of
their relatives. "Truly," said Bilal, "I did it designedly; I wished to see their grief and anger stirred
up." But Mahomet was moved by tenderer emotions; -- turning complacently towards Safia, he cast his mantle around her, in token that she was to be
his own, and then made her over to the care of Bilal.
1 I assume this to be the case, because (1) she was the
daughter of a chief who had long lived at Medina, and was well
known there; and (2), because Mahomet, immediately upon
Kinana's execution, sent for her and cast his mantle over her.
Indeed he is not free from the suspicion of being influenced in
the destruction of Kinana by the desire of obtaining his wife.
Dihya had also coveted thin Jewish beauty; which,
coming to the knowledge of Mahomet, he made him
content with the present of her cousin.1
Mahomet did not long postpone his nuptials with
Safia.2 The wedding feast was celebrated with abundance of dates, curdled milk, and butter. Earth
was heaped up into the shape of tables; on these
the viands were spread, and the guests ate and were
merry. Meanwhile the Prophet had charged a
female attendant with the duty of suitably arraying
the bride, and making her ready for him. When
the feast was ended, the people, prepared for the
march; and they watched Mahomet, saying: "We
shall see now whether he hath taken her for his
1 I have followed chiefly the Secretary, p. 122; and Hishami, p.836. Borne traditions stats that Safia fell to the lot of
Dihya, and that Mahomet purchased her for seven camels from him. K. Wackidi, 128. But the account in the text is the best supported
and the most consistent.
2 The interval ii not exactly stated anywhere; but it could
not on any supposition have been or long duration. Hishami says,
that the marriage took place at Kheibar, or on the way returning
from it, p. 889. The tenor of other traditions implies no delay
whatever. I do not find any credible tradition intimating Safia's
conversion, as is commonly supposed, before her marriage. Under
any circumstances, it is clear that the period (three months)
prescribed as necessary to intervene before marrying a woman
who had previously been the wife of another, was not on this
occasion observed by Mahomet. Either such ordinance was not
then imposed, or Mahomet exempted himself from its operation.
Omm Suleim was the servant who dressed the hair of Safia,
arrayed her in her bridal attire, and carried her to Mahomet.
She was mother of Mahomet's servant Anis, a citizen of Medina.
Safia's dower was her freedom.
wife or for a slave girl." And when he called for
a screen to hide her from the public gaze, they knew
from thence that she was to be his wife. Mahomet
then lowered his knee to help her to ascend the
camel: after some coy demur, she placed her foot
upon his bended knee, and Mahomet (a bridegroom
now of sixty years of age) raising her into the litter,
conducted her to the bridal tent. In the morning
he heard the noise of one rustling against the curtain
of the tent. It was Abu Ayub, who had there
kept watch a" night with his drawn sword.1 What
has brought thee here? asked Mahomet, surprised
at the intrusion of his friend: "O Prophet!" he
replied, "I bethought me that the damsel is young;
it is but as yesterday that she was married to Kinana,
whom thou hast slain. And thus, distrusting her,
I said to myself, I will watch by the tent and be close
at hand, in case she attempt anything against thee."
Mahomet blessed him for his careful vigilance, and
desired him to depart in peace.2
The precaution was unnecessary: for (if tradition
speak truly) Safia accommodated herself most
readily to the new alliance. It is related that she
bore the mark of a bruise upon her eye; when the
Prophet asked her tenderly the cause, she told him
that while yet Kinana's bride, she saw in a dream
as if the moon had fallen from the heavens into
1 The citizen with whom Mahomet lived on his first arrival at
Medina.
2 K. Wackidi, 123.
her lap; and that when she told Kinana, he struck
her violently, saying: "What is the dream but
that thou covetest this king of the Hejaz, the Prophet, for thy husband!" The mark of the blow was the same which Mahomet saw.
But all the women of Kheibar were not equally
changeable and faithless. The nuptials of Mahomet
were damped by the revenge of Zeinab, the sister
of the warrior Marhab, who had lost her husband,
her father, her brother, and other relatives in the
battle.1 She dressed a kid, and having steeped it
in a deadly poison, placed it with fair words before
Mahomet, at the hour of his evening repast. Graciously accepting the gift, he took the shoulder (the part he loved to eat, and which Zeinab had therefore impregnated most strongly) for himself tore
off a choice bone for Bishr who sat next him, and
distributed portions to Abu Bakr and his other followers around. Scarcely had he swallowed the first
mouthful, when he exclaimed: "Hold! surely this
shoulder hath been poisoned;" and he spat forth
what was in his mouth. Bishr, who had eaten more
than Mahomet, at once changed colour, and stirred
neither hand nor foot, until he died.2 Mahomet
1 Her husband was Sallam, and her father Harith, both chief
men.
2 Some say that he died on the spot, others, that he lingered
for a year, but unable to stir his limbs, or to move from one side
to the other.
3 It is a favourite tradition, that Mahomet said, "the shoulder
tells me," or "lets me know that it is poisoned." it was natural
was seized with excruciating pain, and caused himself, and all those who had with him partaken of the
dish, to be freely cupped between the shoulders.
Zeinab was then summoned, and interrogated as to
the motive of her offence: - "Thou hast inflicted;"
she replied boldly, "these grievous injuries on my
people; thou hast slain my father, and my uncle,
and my husband. Therefore I said within myself,
if he is a Prophet he will be aware that the shoulder
of the kid is poisoned, but if he be a mere pretender,
then we shall be rid of him, and the Jews will
again prosper." She was put to death.1 The effects
for this tradition to grow up, as it might very easily do unintentionally, from the various forms of expression in telling the story, or being in order to screen the Prophet from the charge
of being devoid of prophetical knowledge. Mahomet did not
assume for himself the ordinary possession of such knowledge;
but tradition soon did so to a great extent for him.
Mahomet at any rate swallowed his first mouthful
before he perceived the evil taste.
Bishr said that he perceived the unusual taste at once, but did
not stop eating, simply because he did not wish to set Mahomet
against the food,- that he wished to die for Mahomet, &c.
1 K. Wackidi, 121,140 ½, 290 ½ ; Hishami, 288. Some say that
she was set free upon making this exculpatory statement. But
the balance of tradition is decidedly as in the text. Certain
traditions state that she was made over to the relatives of
Bishr,
to be put to death judicially, for having poisoned him. The
woman's speech in justification is cast in a rather common traditional type. Still, under the circumstances, it is not so unnatural as the common speeches of this kind are; and, if true, it
is a specimen such as we do not often meet with in servile tradition, of undaunted opposition to the Conqueror,--- a contrast to the fickle heartlessness or Safia.
of the poison were felt by Mahomet to his dying
day.1
After the victory at Camuss, the only remaining
strongholds of Kheibar, namely Watih, and Salalim,
were invested; and, seeing no prospect of relief,
capitulated. They were thus saved from being
sacked; but, like the rest of Kheibar, their lands
were subjected to a tax of half the produce. Fadak,
a Jewish town, not far from Kheibar, profited by
its example, and having tendered a timely submission, was admitted to the same terms.
On his march homewards from Kheibar, Mahomet
laid siege to the Jewish settlement at Wadi al
Cora, which after a resistance of one or two days,
surrendered. The authority of Mahomet was thus
established over all the Jewish tribes north of Medina.3
The plunder of Kheibar was rich beyond all previous experience. Besides vast stores of dates, oil,
honey, and bailey, flocks of sheep and herds of
camels,4 the spoil in treasure and jewels was very
1 Hence, the traditionists delight to hold that Mahomet had the
merit of a martyr. And the same is also said of Abu Bakr, one
of those who also partook of the kid.
2 Wackidi, p. 6.
3 M. C. de Perceval says that the Jews or Tayma also tendered
thek submission, iii. 203. This is likely enough, though it is
not mentioned by K. Wackidi or Hishami.
4 C. de Perceval, iii. 202. This detail is not given in my
authorities, which deal in general terms. Hishimi says, that from the time of Kheibar, slaves became very plentiful among the Moslems, p. 333. I do not find that, excepting the family of
large. A fifth of the whole was as usual set apart
for the use of the Prophet, and for distribution at
will among his family and the destitute poor. The
remaining four-fifths were sold by outcry, and the
proceeds, according to the prescribed rule, divided
into one thousand eight hundred shares, being one
share for a foot soldier, and three for a horseman.1
The villages and lands were disposed of upon
another principle. One half was reserved for Mahomet, and constituted thereafter a species of Crown
domain; it embraced the tract of Kuteiba and the
forts of Watih and Salalim. The other moiety was
divided into one thousand eight hundred portions,
and allotted by the same rule as the personal booty.
A large and permanent source of revenue was thus
Kinana, any mention is mode of slaves taken at Kheibar. But
money, which the victors obtained plentifully at Kheibar, could
purchase them cheaply in any part of Arabia.
1 K. Wackidi 121. M .C. de Perceval represents the Prophet as taking one half; but this was clearly not the case. He
obtained
one half of the land, but the personal plunder took its usual
course.
There is some discrepancy as to the number, and the shares, of
the horsemen. All agree that there were one thousand eight
hundred shares; but some say that there were only one hundred
horse, - each of which obtained three shares, which would make
the army one thousand fire hundred strong in foot, with one
hundred hone. Others say, there were two hundred horse: of
which each obtained two shares; this would make the infantry
one thousand four hundred in number ; - in either case, the total
strength of both arms to one thousand six hundred. K. Wackidi121, 122 ½.
M.C. de Perceval says that something additional was given to
those who had chargers of pure Arab blood. But I do not find
notice of this in my authorities.
secured for all those who had given proof of their
faith and loyalty, by accompanying Mahomet to
Hodeibia, and the promise made by the Prophet on
that expedition was amply redeemed.
Even in those portions of Kheibar which were
gained by storm, it was found expedient, in the
absence of other cultivators, to leave the Jewish
inhabitants in possession, on the condition already
specified, of surrendering half the produce. An
appraiser was deputed yearly to assess the amount,
to realize the rents, and transmit them to Medina 1
This arrangement continued till the Caliphate of
Omar, when, there being no scarcity of Moslem
husbandmen, the Jews were expatriated, and entire
possession taken of their lands.2
1 Abdallah ibn Rawaha first performed this duty, being a sort
of arbiter between the Jewish cultivators and Moslem proprietors.
Whenever the former charged him with exceeding in his estimate,
he would say, "If it seem good unto you, take ye the estimated
sum and give us the crop, or give us the estimated sum, and
keep ye the crop." The Jews greatly esteemed his justice. He
was killed the year following at Muta. Hishami, 343.
2 This is the plain and consistent statement of the Secretary.
Advantage was naturally taken by Omar, in carrying out the
expatriation of the Jews, of the fact that his son Abdallah had
been wounded in his possessions there; but it is distinctly
admitted
that there was no proof as to who committed the outrage. Omar
concluded that it must have been the Jews, simply because it
was the second case of the kind. The previous case was the
murder of Abdallah ibn Sahal; but here, too, there was no
evidence; and therefore Mahomet justly paid the blood money
himself.
Two other grounds to justify Omar's expulsion of the Jews
Some special ordinances were promulgated in this
campaign. The flesh of the domestic ass (which
the army on their first approach to Kheibar were
driven by want of other food to eat) was forbidden,
as well as that of all carnivorous animals 1. Some
restrictions were laid upon the immediate liberty
of cohabitation, heretofore enjoyed in respect of
female captives; but of whatever nature they were,
it is clear that they did not fetter Mahomet in the
marriage contracted with his female captive Safia.2
are given by tradition -(1), Mahomet plainly stipulated that the
Jews were to hold possession, pending his pleasure, - they were
mere tenants-at-will. (2), Mahomet said on his death-bed that
no religion but Islam was to be permitted throughout the Peninsula;
I doubt both grounds, and believe that they have been adduced
simply from the desire to justify Omar's cruel expulsion
of the Jews. Hashami, 344.
1 See the similar rules in
the Coran, Sura, v.4; including what is torn, or dieth
of itself, &c. There are some curious traditions on this part
of the narrative. The soldiers were every where boiling asses
flesh in their pots throughout the camp, when the order was given,
and forthwith they all overturned their pots.
Horseflesh is allowed. K. Wackidi, 122.
2 The subject is one into which, from its nature,
I cannot enter with much detail; but as it partly affects the character
or Mahomet, in not having himself conformed to a law imposed upon his followers,
I may remark that some traditions hold that Mahomet now prescribed that
the "istabra," or interval required between divorce and re-marriage,
was to be equally observed in the case of women taken in war as in all other
cases. The Sonna has fixed this period for slaves at half the interval required
for free women; -that is, two months (or possibly a month and a half),
before the lapse of which, consorting with female slaves so captured is unlawful.
Mahomet evidently did not himself conform to this rule in the case of Safia,
as before explained. Some traditions
The most stringent rules were issued to prevent
fraudulent appropriation from the common stock of
booty. "No Believer shall sell aught of the spoil,
until it has been divided; nor shall he take a beast
therefrom, and after riding upon it until it become
lean, return it; nor shall he take and wear a garment, and then send it back threadbare." A follower was convicted of plundering two sandal straps;
the articles in themselves were insignificant: yet,
said the Prophet to the thief "Verily there shall
be cut out for thee hereafter two thongs like unto
them of fire."1 When the army alighted before
Wadi al Cora, Abd al Ghal, a servant of Mahomet,
was shot by an arrow; in the act of taking the litter
down from one of the camels:-" Welcome to Paradise!" exclaimed the bystanders. "Never!", said
Mahomet; "by him in whose hand my life is! Even
now his vestment is burning upon him in the fire of
Hell; for he pilfered it before Kheibar from amongst
the booty."2
make the prohibition delivered on the present occasion to
apply to pregnant women only: Hishami; 333; K. Wackidi, 122;
but if so, it is not apparent at what later period the farther and
more general restriction was introduced.
1 K. Wackidi, 122; and Hishami, 339.
2 Hishami 338. The story is very possibly exaggerated, it
being an object among the Mussulmans to make the general right
of the army in all the booty taken by it as secure and sacred as
possible. But it show. the tendency and spirit of the system,
under which a tradition of this nature could be put into the mouth
of the Prophet, and as such, gain currency.
As a counterpart to this incident, and showing the
certainty of Paradise secured by the mere profession
of Islam, I may transcribe the following tradition.
Al Aswad, the shepherd of one of the Jews of
Kheibar, came over to Mahomet, and declared himself a believer. Abandoning his flock, he straight-way joined the Moslem army and fought in its ranks.1
1 It is said that he asked Mahomet what he was to do with
his flock. On the principle that a believer must discharge all his
trusts and obligations, even those contracted with idolaters,
before
joining the standard of Islam, the Prophet desired him to throw a
handful of gravel in the faces of the sheep and goats, whereupon
they all ran off forthwith to their owner in the fortress.
He was struck by a stone and killed, before he had
yet as a Moslem offered up a single prayer. But he
died fighting for the faith, and therefore had secured
a Marty's crown. Surrounded by a company of his
followers, Mahomet visited the corpse, which had
been laid out for him to pray over. When he drew
close to the spot, he abruptly stopped and looked
another way. '(Why dost thou thus avert thy face!"
asked those about him. "Because," said Mahomet,
"two black-eyed houries of Paradise, his wives, are
with the martyr now; they wipe the dust from off
his face, and fondly solace him."1
About this period, Mahomet had the pleasure
to welcome back his cousin Jafar, Ali's brother,
who, with some of the exiles just returned from
Abyssinia, went out to meet the army as it came back
from Kheibar "I know not," Mahomet said, "which
of the two deligliteth me the most, Jafar's arrival,
or the conquest of Kheibar." The army cheerfully
acceded to his proposal that their newly arrived
friends should be admitted to share in the spoil.
days, that he had told a lie, - for that Mahomet had vanquished
Kheibar, and married the king's daughter. K. Wackidi, 121;
Hisha,i 342. The story is doubtful, however.
1 Hishami, p.541. Neither can I vouch for this story, but
like the last, it illustrates the spirit of Islam, and the
teaching of Mahomet, under the influence of which such tales grew up.
"Whenever a martyr is slain in battle," so runs the tradition,
"his two black-eyed wives, the houries, draw near unto him,
wipe the dust from off his face, and say, - 'The Lord cast dust on
the face of him who hath cast dust on thine, and slay him who slew
thee!'"
On the return of Mahomet to Medina, he completed the marriage with
Omm Habiba, daughter of Abu Sofian which the Najashy had contracted
for him in Abyssinia. There were now nine wives, besides two female
slaves, in the harem of the Prophet.
Before closing this chapter, which contains the
last notice of the Jews of Arabia, I ought to mention the tale of
Mahomet's having been bewitched by a Jewish spell. On his return
from Hodeibia, the Jews who still remained at Medina (ostensibly
converted, but hypocrites and enemies at heart,) bribed a sorcerer
named Labid and his daughters. to bewitch Mahomet. This they did
by secretly procuring hairs combed from the Prophet's head, and
tying eleven knots with them on the branch of a male palm, which
was then put at the bottom of a well, with a large stone over it.
The enchantment took effect: Mahomet began to pine away,to fancy
he had done things which in reality he never had done, to lose his
appetite, and to neglect his wives. At last, Gabriel told him the
secret of his ailment. The well was emptied, and the knots untied.
Immediately the spell broke, and the Prophet was relieved.
I must confess myself unable to decide what portion of the tale is true,
or whether it has any foundation at all in fact. The common tradition is,
that the two last Suras in the Coran were revealed on this occasion,
containing a charm against all spells and
incantations; and, that during the recitation of the eleven verses
which they contain, the knots unravelled themselves one by one till
the whole were unloosed, and the charm dissolved. The hundred
and thirteenth Sura is as follows:
The story may possibly have grown out of the penultimate verse
of this Sura, in which Mahomet prays to be delivered "from the
evil of the women blowing upon knots."1
Or, on the other hand, it may be founded on suspicions actually
entertained by Mahomet against the Jews, of sorcery by the tying
of knots, and other forms of incantation; and these suspicions
may have led to the composition of the Sura.
The latter alternative is supported by the consideration that Mahomet
was by nature superstitious, and that he had already suspected the
Jews of bewitching the Moslem women into barrenness. On the present
occasion, he is said to have caused the well into which the mysterious
knots had been cast to be dug up, and another sunk in its place. On
his return from visiting the spot, he told Ayesha that "the date-trees
in the garden were like devils' heads,
1 Compare Ezekiel, ziii. 18, to end.
and the water of the well dark as a decoction of
Henna." She inquired whether the incident might
with propriety be spoken of; he replied that it would
be better that she should not divulge it, lest it might
cause the evil of witchcraft to spread amongst his
people.
Some traditions say that the sorcerer was put to death; but the more
reliable account is, that Mahomet let him go free, but turned with
aversion from him.1
1 The Secretary, p. 140, has a profusion
of traditions on the subject. The story, upon the whole, is given
with great consistency. Some say that it was Labid's sisters
who assisted him; and that it was two Angels who revealed the
plot to Mahomet.
The Life of Mahomet, Volume IV [Table of Contents]
page 68
page 69
page 70
page 71
page 72
page 73
page 74
page 75
page 76
page 77
page 78
On the same principle, it is said, 'Ali and other converts first
scrupulously discharged the trusts which the Coreish had committed to them, before leaving Mecca to join Mahomet at Medina.
And a like principle has been applied by many strict Mahometans
in decisive condemnation of the perfidy of the Sepoys in the late
Indian rebellion. They were the servants, say they, of the
British
Government; and (even if then had been grounds for a religious
war) ought first, like Ali and Al Aswad, to have discharged their
trusts in full, and rendered up, instead of plundering, the
arsenals
and treasures in their custody.
No doubt the argument and inference are just, but they stand
in unhappy contrast with the disregard of other principles of
morality shown by Mahomet in his treatment of the Jews, and
especially in the perfidious assassinations which he countenanced
or ordered.
As a counterpoise to Al Aswad's integrity, I may mention the
artifice by which Al Hajaj is said to have recovered his debts.
With Mahomet's permission he went to Mecca, and he told the
Coreish that Mahomet had been vanquished and, with all his
followers, taken prisoner. The Coreish, in ecstasies at the
intelligence, paid off all his claims. Before leaving Mecca, he made
known to Abbas, on condition of his keeping it secret for three
page 79
page 80
page 81
page 82