Answering Dr. Jamal Badawi:
Jamal Badawi's Misinformation and Misquotations - Part 4
Badawi and the use of Liberal Scholars
Badawi is fond of appealing to either Christian or Jewish scholars who are liberal in their views regarding the origins of the Holy Bible. Badawi thinks that by appealing to such scholars he can undermine the authority, integrity and accuracy of the Holy Scriptures.
One such scholar that Badawi often refers to is John C. Fenton. In his debate with Dr. Gleason L. Archer and Dr. Robert Douglas titled God as viewed in the Bible and the Qur'an, Badawi stated:
The first problem with Badawi's quotation is that it gives the impression that he is actually quoting Fenton. Badawi makes it as if Fenton actually calls Matthew "obsessed".
Yet here is what Fenton actually wrote:
Moreover, so sure was Matthew of the truth of this relationship between the Old Testament and the life of Jesus that he would sometimes change the details of an event as they were recorded in his source, in order to bring out more clearly the correspondence to a prophecy; as in the example given above, where he changed Mark's myrrh to gall, to make the fulfillment of the Greek version of Ps. 69.21.
Modern study of the Old Testament does not support Matthew's understanding of it, nor the use he made of it when he was writing his Gospel. It is NOW seen that the Old Testament WAS NOT A COLLECTION OF DETAILED FORETELLINGS OF FUTURE EVENTS, WHICH COULD ONLY BE UNDERSTOOD CENTURIES LATER; the Old Testament writers were in fact writing for their contemporaries in a way which could be understood by them, and describing things that would happen MORE OR LESS IN THEIR OWN LIFETIME. Thus Matthew's use of the Old Testament, though it was no doubt of first rate importance to Matthew's original readers, and continued to be helpful until modern historical study enabled us to see the Old Testament in a new way, is now a STUMBLING BLOCK TO THE TWENTIETH CENTURY READER OF THE GOSPEL.
We must, however, try to see what Matthew was saying by means of these fulfillments; because it may be that what he was saying is still capable of being understood and accepted, although his way of saying it is no longer valid. And we should notice here that Matthew IS NOT ALONE in using the Old Testament in this way: from the first, the Christians had preached the death and resurrection of Jesus as events which happened in accordance with the scriptures, see I Cor. 15.3ff.; and it may be THAT JESUS HIMSELF INTERPRETED HIS LIFE AND DEATH AS THE FULFILMENT OF PROPHECY: see, for example, Mark 14.27, where Jesus quotes Zech. 13.7, You will all fall away; for is written, 'I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep will be scattered' as a prophecy of his death and his disciples' flight. (Fenton, Saint Matthew-The Penguin New Testament Commentaries, Penguin Books, 1963, pp. 17-19; bold and capital emphasis ours)
If Fenton is correct, then not only was Matthew wrong for believing that the OT contains actual predictions of future events, but so was Jesus! This also means that both the Quran and Badawi are wrong to believe that the Holy Bible actually predicted the advent of Muhammad.
Second, Fenton's denial that the OT contains predictive prophecy exposes one of his underlying assumptions, namely his anti-supernatural bias. This bias forbids Fenton from believing that God has actually revealed himself in Scripture. Since Scripture is not actual revelation from God, it therefore cannot contain predictive prophecy. It is little wonder then that Fenton finds problems with Mathew's methodology, since he has already begun with the assumption that the OT prophets never predicted the future. He then proceeds to use this assumption as the basis to explain Matthew's Gospel.
Third, in the same dialogue Badawi quoted Fenton's comments regarding Matthew's citation of Micah 5:2 to show that Matthew actually combined two OT passages together, i.e. the one from Micah and 2 Samuel 5:2. Presumably, Badawi did so to cast doubt on Matthew's credibility to quote the OT accurately. Yet when one reads Fenton in context, a different picture emerges:
We see that Matthew's method of combining OT passages was something also employed by the rabbis. This clearly demonstrates that in light of its historical setting Matthew's use of the OT was thoroughly Jewish, being completely accurate and acceptable to first century readers.
Fourth, when one does read Fenton's book one will find that the author fails to provide any real evidence. Rather, the book is filled with unproven assumptions and hypothetical constructions devoid of any historical facts. These assertions are then read back into the text as gospel truth. For instance, Fenton's book is filled with expressions like "perhaps", "probably", "possibly", "seems", "may have". This clearly demonstrates that Fenton has chosen to allow his assumptions to influence his understanding of Matthew.
A word of caution here. Assumptions are not necessarily wrong, since everyone has a set of assumptions that they begin with. Yet when the evidence clearly refutes or does not support a person's assumptions that person must be willing to discard his/her presuppositions and let the evidence determine one's position. Clearly, neither Fenton nor Badawi have allowed the evidence to speak for itself, but have allowed their own prejudices to affect their reading of the Holy Bible.
In light of the preceding points, we will now apply Fenton's methodology against the Quran. This will be done to see whether the Quran will be able pass the very same criteria used by the liberals in analyzing the Holy Bible and seemingly accepted by Badawi as reasonable criteria to judge revelation from God.
The Quran doesn't simply misquote the Old Testament, but also the New Testament as well. The Quran refers to passages or statements that are either nonexistent or not cited correctly.
Quran:
We challenge Badawi to show us a single reference from the Gospels where fighting is commanded upon Christians.
Quran:
Compare:
"Anyone who takes the life of someone's animal must make restitution - life for life. If anyone injures his neighbor, whatever he has done must be done to him: fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. As he has injured the other, so he is to be injured. Whoever kills an animal must make restitution, but whoever kills a man must be put to death." Leviticus 24:18-21
"Show no pity: life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot." Deuteronomy 19:21
We would like for Badawi to show us where the phrase "the nose for the nose" appears in the Holy Bible.
Quran:
Compare:
"But the meek will inherit the land and enjoy great peace… the righteous will inherit the land and dwell in it forever." Psalm 37:11, 29
Can Badawi show us where the phrase "My righteous slaves" is found in the scriptures? If he is unable, will Badawi conclude that the Quran is in error for failing to accurately and literally quote the OT word for word, choosing instead to either paraphrase or modify the text?
The Quran asserts certain biblical facts and prophecies that do not exist in the Holy Bible. For instance, the Quran claims that it appears in the previous scriptures:
We challenge Badawi to show us one place where the Quran is mentioned or where the Quran exists within the previous revelation.
The Quran also claims that there are prophecies of Muhammad:
Contrary to what the Quran and Badawi claim, there is not a single prophecy of Muhammad in the entire Holy Bible. We have read Badawi's pamphlet where he seeks to show otherwise and have found his arguments to be very poor and unscholarly. Read the following articles [1] and [2] for the evidence.
Parallel Accounts that Conflict
Much like the Synoptic Gospels, the Quran often repeats the same story with verbal variations. One finds the same story repeated in either a more condensed form, with greater detail, or with major verbal differences. Several examples help illustrate this:
Example 1
So when the sorcerers arrived, They said to Pharaoh: "Of course- shall we have a suitable reward if we win?" He said: "Yea, (and more),- For ye shall in that case Be (raised in posts) Nearest (to my person)." Moses said to them, "Throw ye- which ye are about to throw!" So They threw their ropes And their rods, and said: "By the might of Pharaoh It is we who will Certainly win!" Then Moses threw his rod, When, behold, it straightway swallows up all The falsehoods which they fake! Then did the Sorcerers fall down, prostration in adoration, Saying: "We believe in the Lord of the Worlds, The Lord of Moses and Aaron." Said Pharaoh: "Believe ye In Him before I give You permission? Surely he is your leader who has Taught you sorcery! But soon shall ye know!" Be sure I will cut off Your hands and your feet On opposite sides, and I Will cause ye all To die On the cross!" They said: "No matter! For us, we shall but return to our Lord! Only, our desire is That our Lord will forgive us our faults, That We may become Foremost among the Believers!" S. 26:41-52 (Cf. 7:111-126)
Let us contrast the parallel passages and see how they diverge in wording:
Sura 20- "We believe In the Lord of Aaron and Moses."
Compare:
Sura 26- "We believe in the Lord of the Worlds, The Lord of Moses and Aaron."
Example 2
Behold! Moses said to his family "I perceive A fire; soon will I bring you From there some information, Or I will Bring you A burning brand to light our fuel That ye may Warm yourselves." But when he came To the (Fire), a voice Was heard: "Blessed are those In the Fire and those around: And Glory to God, The Lord of the Worlds. "O Moses! Verily I am God, the Exalted In Might, the wise!... "Now do throw thy rod!" But when he saw it Moving (of its own accord) As if it had been a snake, He turned back in Retreat, And retraced not his steps: "O Moses!" (it was said), "Fear not: truly, in My presence, Those called as apostles Have no fear,- But if Any have done wrong And have thereafter substituted Good to take the place of the evil, Truly, I am Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. "Now put thy hand into Thy bosom, and it will Come forth white without stain (Or harm): (These are) among The nine Signs (thou wilt take) To Pharaoh and his people: For they are A people Rebellious in transgression." But when Our Signs came To them, that should opened their eyes, they said: "This is Sorcery manifest!" And they rejected those Signs In iniquity and arrogance, Though their Souls were convinced Thereof: so see what was The end of those Who acted corruptly. S. 27:7-14
Now when Moses had fulfilled The term, and was traveling With his family, he perceived A fire in the direction of Mount Tur. He said To his family: "Tarry ye; I perceive a fire; I hope To bring you from there Some information, or a burning Firebrand that ye may warm yourselves." But when he came To the (Fire), a voice was heard from the right back Of the valley, from a tree In hallowed ground: "O Moses! Verily I am God, the Lord of the Worlds… Now do thou throw thy rod! But when he saw it Moving (of its own accord) As if it had been a snake, He turned back in retreat and retraced not his steps: "O Moses!" (It was said), "Draw near, and fear not; For thou art of those Who are secure. "Move thy hand into thy bosom, and it will Come forth to thy side (To guard) against fear. Those are the two credentials From thy Lord to Pharaoh And his Chiefs: for truly They are a people Rebellious and wicked." S. 28:29-33
Despite the fact that there are serious verbal variations throughout these Suras, we will limit ourselves to the following portions:
Sura 20- "Verily I am thy Lord!… Verily, I am God: There is no god but I: So serve thou Me (only), And establish regular prayer For celebrating My praise"
Compare:
Sura 27- "And Glory to God, The Lord of the Worlds. O Moses! Verily I am God, the Exalted In Might, the wise!"
Compare:
Sura 28- "Verily I am God, the Lord of the Worlds."
Example 3
It is We Who created you and gave you shape; then We bade the angels prostrate to Adam, and they prostrated; not so Iblis; He refused to be of those who bow down. (Allah) said: "What prevented thee from bowing down when I commanded thee?" He said: "I am better than he: Thou didst create me from fire, and him from clay." (Allah) said: "Get thee down from it (the Garden): it is not for thee to be arrogant here: get out, for thou art of the meanest (of creatures)." He said: "Give me respite till the day they are raised up." (Allah) said: "Be thou among those who have respite." He said: "Because thou hast thrown me out (of the Way), lo! I will lie in wait for them on Thy Straight Way: Then will I assault them from before them and behind them, from their right and their left: Nor wilt Thou find, in most of them, gratitude (for Thy mercies)." (Allah) said: "Get out from this, disgraced and expelled. If any of them follow thee,- Hell will I fill with you all." S. 7:11-18
Behold! thy Lord said to the angels: "I am about to create man, from sounding clay from mud molded into shape; When I have fashioned him (in due proportion) and breathed into him of My spirit, fall ye down in obeisance unto him." So the angels prostrated themselves, all of them together: Not so Iblis: he refused to be among those who prostrated themselves. (Allah) said: "O Iblis! what is your reason for not being among those who prostrated themselves?" (Iblis) said: "I am not one to prostrate myself to man, whom Thou didst create from sounding clay, from mud molded into shape." (Allah) said: "Then get thee out from here; for thou art rejected, accursed. And the Curse shall be on thee till the day of Judgment." (Iblis) said: "O my Lord! give me then respite till the Day the (dead) are raised." (Allah) said: "Respite is granted thee - Till the Day of the Time Appointed." (Iblis) said: "O my Lord! because Thou hast put me in the wrong, I will make (wrong) fair-seeming to them on the earth, and I will put them all in the wrong,- Except Thy chosen servants among them." (Allah) said: "This is for me a Straight Path. For over My servants no authority shalt thou have, except such as put themselves in the wrong and follow thee." S. 15:28-42
Behold! We said to the angels: "Prostrate unto Adam" They prostrated except Iblis: He said, "Shall I prostrate to one whom Thou didst create from clay?" He said: "Seest Thou? this is the one whom Thou hast honored above me! If Thou wilt but respite me to the Day of Judgment, I will surely bring his descendants under my sway - all but a few!" (Allah) said: "Go thy way; if any of them follow thee, verily Hell will be the recompense of you (all)- an ample recompense. And arose those whom thou canst among them, with thy (seductive) voice; make assaults on them with thy cavalry and thy infantry; mutually share with them wealth and children; and make promises to them." But Satan promises them nothing but deceit. S. 17:61-64
Behold, thy Lord said to the angels: "I am about to create man from clay: When I have fashioned him and breathed into him of My spirit, fall ye down in obeisance unto him." So the angels prostrated themselves, all of them together: Not so Iblis: he was haughty, and became one of those who reject Faith. (Allah) said: "O Iblis! What prevents thee from prostrating thyself to one whom I have created with My hands? Art thou haughty? Or art thou one of the high (and mighty) ones?" (Iblis) said: "I am better than he: Thou createdst me from fire, and him Thou createdst from clay." (Allah) said: "Then get thee out from here: for thou art rejected, accursed. And My Curse shall be on thee till the Day of Judgment." (Iblis) said: "O my Lord! Give me then respite till the Day the (dead) are raised." (Allah) said: "Respite then is granted thee-Till the Day of the Time Appointed." (Iblis) said: "Then, by Thy Power, I will lead them all astray,- Except Thy Servants amongst them, sincere and purified (by Thy Grace)." (Allah) said: "This is the Truth, and the Truth I say,- That I will certainly fill Hell with thee and those that follow thee,- every one." S. 38:71-85
The major verbal variations as are so vast and so many that to highlight them would be rather lengthy. Any fair reading of the passages should make it abundantly clear that the Quran gives contradictory and conflicting versions of Iblis' exact words to God and God's exact response to him.
Example 4
And remember it was said to them: "DWELL in this town and eat therein as ye wish, but say the word of humility and enter the gate in a posture of humility: We shall forgive you your faults; We shall increase (the portion of) those who do good." But the transgressors among them changed the word from that which had been given them so we sent on them a plague from heaven. For that they repeatedly TRANSGRESSED. S. 7:161-162
Here is Abdullah Yusuf Ali's footnote:
Example 5
They said: O Lot! we are the messengers of your Lord; they shall by no means reach you; so remove your family in a part of the night - and let none of you look back - except your wife, for surely whatsoever befalls them shall befall her; surely their appointed time is the morning; is not the morning nigh? S. 11:81
But we saved him and his family, except his wife: she was of those who lagged behind. S. 7:83
In the preceding citations we are told in one place that an old woman lagged behind. In the other accounts it is Lot's wife.
John Gilchrist furnishes additional evidence and comments on the conflicting variations within the same stories:
One cannot help presuming that Muhammad had a fairly sound knowledge of the history of the patriarchs from Noah to the sons of Jacob but was somewhat at sea regarding the sequence of the prophets that followed. Indeed the later prophets, from Isaiah to Malachi, with the exception of Jonah, are conspicuous purely by their absence in the Qur'an.
There is nothing of the teaching of the writing prophets of the Old Testament, and practically nothing of the teaching of the New Testament. (Watt, Muhammad: Prophet and Statesman, p. 54).
On the other hand there are numerous stories in the Qur'an relating to the earlier prophets and New Testament figureheads which are borrowed from Jewish Talmudic sources and Christian apocryphal writings respectively. Examples of these are found in the sections on Qur'anic origins and sources to follow. It seems that Muhammad's knowledge of the Bible was limited to information from secondary sources, though this knowledge did improve as time went on.
An example of the growing accuracy of the Qur'anic records of the events in the lives of the Biblical prophets proves the point. In Surah 26.160-175 one finds a brief record of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah and of a typical conversation between the prophet Lot and his unbelieving people. Lot was delivered with his family "except an old woman who lingered behind" (Surah 26.171, as also 37.135). The story is roughly repeated in Surah 27.54-58, except that in this case, as in all the other later records of this event, the woman is now positively identified as his wife (Surah 27.57). There is as yet no hint of the involvement of the angels who came as God's messengers in human form to destroy the cities but, in later passages, they finally appear while the narratives of the whole episode are simultaneously embellished with further information.
In Surah 15.51-77 there is a brief record of the visit of the angels and their mission. Furthermore Abraham is now linked to the story of the destruction of these cities (typically not mentioned by name in the Qur'an) in that the angels visit him first to announce their purpose (v.58-60) as in the Bible (Genesis 18.16-22). When they come to Lot, however, they disclose their true identities immediately as well as their design and call on him to leave by night with his household (v.63-66). Only after this do the townsmen come to Lot to demand his guests and, as in the Bible (Genesis 19.8), Lot offers them his daughters (v.71). The record is very similar to the Biblical account except that in the Bible the angels only make their true identities known after the altercation with the tribesmen (Genesis 19.11) and only then command him to prepare to leave with his family as they make their mission known to him (Genesis 19.12-13). The Qur'anic error in placing these disclosures before the visit of the townsmen leads to a somewhat irrational situation:
In Surah 11.74-85 Muhammad finally gets it right. Once again the angels come to Abraham and this time the Qur'an mentions the prayer he offered to deliver the cities. Furthermore the disclosure of the identities of the angelic guests and their purpose to deliver Lot and his family and destroy the cities is now rightly placed after the altercation with the townsmen (v.81-82). Now the fears of Lot about the security of his guests when the townsmen arrive makes sense. He is said to have "felt himself powerless" (v.77) to protect them and openly expresses his regret that he could not summon powerful support on their behalf (v.80). Only at this point do they disclose their true identities as angelic messengers and only now is he called to leave with his family by night. All this is consistent with the Biblical narrative but is contradictory of the account in Surah 15 where the disclosures are said to have been made before the townsmen confronted Lot.
All these features strongly support the statement made by Margoliouth that, as the Qur'an developed, so its record of the events relating to the Biblical prophets became significantly more accurate. This conclusion can hardly be resisted in the circumstances:
(Gilchrist, Muhammad and the Religion of Islam [Jesus To the Muslims PO Box 1804 Benoni Republic of South Africa, 1986], pp. 163-166; bold and capital emphasis ours)
Even a Muslim scholar acknowledges the difficulty posed by the verbal variations within the parallel Quranic accounts:
Hence, Muslim themselves have discovered and stumbled at the fact that the same Quranic stories contain verbal variations. Using Fenton's methodology we are forced to conclude that the different writers of the Quran embellished or changed the same story in order to agree with their theological or political agendas.
What makes these examples even more difficult for the Muslim position is that unlike the Christian view of the Holy Bible, Muslims believe that the Quran is divine dictation that Muhammad memorized and caused to be written down. Muslims take pride in the fact that Muhammad had nothing to do with composing the Quran. They claim that the Quran is devoid of both the words and personality of Muhammad since the Quran contains the revealed words of God alone.
If this is the case, then Badawi can perhaps clarify and explain how God can retell the same story with major contradictions and verbal variations. We eagerly await his response.
Badawi has also chosen to quote scholars that have embraced the Documentary Hypothesis. This hypothesis asserts that four independent sources were compiled together to form the Pentateuch. The names given to these hypothetical documents are the Yahwist source (J), Elohist source (E), the Deuteronomist source (D), and the Priestly source or editors (P). This is commonly referred to as the JEDP theory.
The problem with this view is that both archaeology and the majority of biblical scholars have by now thoroughly debunked the Documentary Hypothesis. The hypothesis lacks any real historical evidence to support it, and is merely based on unproven assumptions.
In spite of this, since Badawi thinks this is a valid approach to analyze holy scripture, we would like to apply the Documentary Hypothesis on the Quran and see how this would affect the traditional Islamic view regarding the Quran's origin:
Sura
Date of
Times
Number
Times per
Times
Times
Number
Sura
Allah used
of Verses
Verse
Rabb Used
per Verse
48
6 AH
19
29
.65
0
0.
49
9 AH
27
18
1.50
0
0.
50
Early Meccan
1
45
.02
2
.04
51
Early Meccan
3
60
.05
5
.08
52
Early Meccan
3
49
.06
6
.12
53
Early Meccan
6
62
.10
7
.11
54
Early Meccan
0
55
0.
1
.02
55
Early Meccan
0
78
0.
36
.46
56
Early Meccan
0
96
0.
3
.03
57
8 AH
32
29
1.10
3
.10
58
5-7 AH
40
22
1.81
0
0.
59
4 AH
29
24
1.21
1
.04
60
8 AH
21
13
1.61
4
.31
61
3 AH
17
14
1.21
0
0.
62
2-5 AH
12
11
1.09
0
0.
63
4-5 AH
14
11
1.27
1
.09
64
1 AH
20
18
1.11
1
.06
When we look at this information we see that in Sura 55 the word Rabb was used 36 times - 31 of them along with the word 'favors' (al-ala'). This word ala' is a rare word in the Qur'an being found only three other times - once in the Early Meccan Sura 53 and twice in the Late Meccan Sura 7. Furthermore, when we examine Sura 53:19-20, we find that it is the only Sura which mentions the three Goddesses Al-Llat, and Al-'Uzza, and Manat.
A higher critic who believes in the 'documentary hypothesis' would now say, 'We see here that Allah is used much less often during the Meccan period, never more than once in every 10 verses. While in the Medina period this name is used at least once a verse except for Sura 48. In addition, the word ala' and the three idol goddesses are found only in these Meccan Suras. Therefore there must have been an early Meccan writer called 'R' because he used 'Rabb' as the name for God, but who was still interested in idols. Later there was a second writer called `A' who used 'Allah' and wrote when pure monotheism had developed. It is true, of course, that in Sura 53, Manat, Al-Llat and Al-`Uzza are mentioned with disapproval, so these disapproving words must have been added at a later date by `Q' which stands for editing done by the 'Qurra'.
Next we find that there are four accounts in the Qur'an telling how the honored guests came to inform Abraham that he would have a son in his old age. The Early Meccan Sura 51:24-30 mentions how Abraham's wife didn't believe and said 'a barren old woman'. This was obviously done by 'R'. The Late Meccan Sura 15:51-56 tells how Abraham didn't believe the news and said, 'Do you give me glad tidings that old age has seized me?' Since this is Late Meccan the `A' writer was starting to have an influence. In the Late Meccan Sura 11:69-74 the two stories have been worked together by one of the 'Q' editors and the fact is added that Abraham's wife laughed.
Finally there is the early Mid-Meccan account in Sura 37:99-103 which is really concerned with Abraham's sacrifice of his son. Since sacrifices are mentioned this represents another document which we will call the `D' document for (al-dabiha) sacrifice. As the reader can see we easily made up a new four document theory for the origin of the Qur'an. We could call it the R,A,Q,D theory. Though this R,A,Q,D theory is completely fictitious it demonstrates the type of arbitrary reasoning used by the authors of the `documentary hypothesis', and shows what would have happened if they had applied the same type of analysis to the Qur'an. (Campbell, The Qur'an and the Bible in light of History and Science, pp. 84-86)
And:
The story of the 'satanic verses'… shows the persistence of some confusion between Allah conceived monotheistically and Allah as a 'high god.' The truth of the story cannot be doubted, since it is inconceivable that any Muslim would invent such a story, and it is inconceivable that any Muslin would accept such a story from a non-Muslim. It also appears to be vouched for by a verse from the Qur'an (22:52). Many Muslims reject the story as unworthy of Muhammad, but there is nothing unworthy of him in holding that his knowledge and understanding of his 'Lord' developed during the early years of hi prophethood as the revelation multiplied." (The History of al-Tabari, Volume VI- Muhammad at Mecca, translated and annotated by W. Montgomery Watt & M.V. McDonald [State University of New York Press, Albany 1988], pp. xxxiii-xxxiv; bold emphasis ours)
The editors continue to relate the story of the "satanic verses" and then make the following comment:
Much like liberal Jewish and Christian scholars have claimed for the Holy Bible, there are Muslims that claim that the Quran contains legendary and mythical stories. Stories that have led Muslims to this conclusion include the Quranic account that Solomon had actual conversations with animals:
Renowned Muslim scholar, the late Muhammad Asad states:
Asad seemingly realized that to believe that this was actual history would be difficult to say the least.
The Quran also claims that both the winds and jinns (demons) were subservient to Solomon:
"So, We subjected to him the wind, it blew gently to his order whithersoever he willed, And also the Shayâtin (devils) from the jinns (including) every kind of builder and diver, And also others bound in fetters. [Saying of Allâh to Solomon]: 'This is Our gift, so spend you or withhold, no account will be asked'." S. 38:36-39
Muhammad Asad notes:
Another Quranic fable includes S. 18:9-23, 25-26 and the Story of the Sleepers of the Cave. According to this tale, several youths and their dog fled to a cave where according to one version of the story they slept for 309 years. Once again, here is Asad:
And:
In fact, Asad often points out that many of the Quranic tales are legendary and mythical. Note the following comments:
Asad on S. 2:102
Asad on S. 2:259
Asad on S. 18:50
And,
When we turn to Asad's notes to S. 2:34-35 on the story of Adam, Eve and the Garden something interesting emerges:
Again,
Asad on S. 18:60
And,
Asad is not alone in acknowledging that the Quran contains ancient fables and tales of both the Arabs and the Judeo-Christian communities. Abdullah Yusuf Ali, in his famous translation of the Quran, also acknowledges this fact.
Ali on S. 2:55
Ali on S. 2:70
Ali on Jews fishing on the Sabbath Day
Ali on Abraham being tossed in the Fire
"... Can we localize Nimrud? If LOCAL TRADITION can be relied upon, the king must have ruled over the tract which includes the modern Nimrud, on the Tigris, about twenty miles south of Mosul. This is the site of the Assyrian ruins of great interest, but the rise of Assyria as an empire was of course much later than the time of Abraham. The Assyrian city Kalakh (Calah), and archaeological excavations carried out there have yielded valuable results, which are however irrelevant for our commentary." (Ali, p. 533, n. 1565; bold emphasis ours)
And,
We conclude this section with the words of Faruq Sherif:
In the course of developing its teachings, the Qur'an frequently cites the example not of prophets and sages of ancient times, but also of some LEGENDARY, MYTHICAL or even FICTITIOUS persons. Chief among these is Khidr, the Evergreen who, though not mentioned by name, is recognised as the mysterious person (the possessor of divinely-inspired knowledge of the secret sources of life) whom Moses met on his ALLEGORICAL journey… Another LEGEND prominently described in the Qur'an is that of the 'seven sleepers' or the 'Companions of the Cave' also mentioned in another section of this book. In this connection mention is made of the angels Harut and Marut who taught magic at Babylon, but warned the people that the teaching was imparted to them only to try them. In the commentaries of the Qur'an Harut and Marut have been identified with the two fallen angels of Jewish tradition who, having sinned on earth, were hung by their feet over a well for punishment.
A summary is given below of the contents of the Qur'an relating to three LEGENDARY figures: Dhulqarnain, Luqman, Qarun. A section is also included on Pharaoh who, although a historical person, often appears in the Qur'an as an archetype for autocracy. The experiences or characteristics of these MYTHICAL or SEMI-MYTHICAL figures are included to serve a salutary example or a dissuasive lesson to believers." (Sherif, A Guide to the Contents of the Qur'an [Garnet Publishing, 8 South Court South Street, Reading, RG1 4QS UK, 1995], pp. 94-95; bold and capital emphasis ours)
If Badawi chooses to uncritically embrace the results of liberal scholars regarding the Holy Bible, he must remain consistent and also accept the implication such theories have on the authenticity of the Quran.
This concludes Part 4. Continue with Part 5.
Further responses to Dr. Badawi
Further articles by Sam Shamoun
Answering Islam Home Page